There are five possible conflict styles. The forcing conflict style user attempts to resolve the conflict by using aggressive behavior. The forcing approach attempts to satisfy one's own needs at the expense of others, if necessary. Forcers use authority, threat, and intimidation powers.

The avoiding conflict style user attempts to passively ignore the conflict rather than resolve it. Avoiders refuse to take a stance, physically leaving it, or escaping the conflict by mentally leaving. Avoiding may maintain relationships that would be hurt through conflict resolution.

The accommodating conflict style user attempts to resolve the conflict by passively giving in to the other party. It attempts to satisfy the other party while neglecting one's own needs. Relationships are developed and maintained by accommodating.

The compromising conflict style user attempts to resolve the conflict through assertive give-and-take concessions. This approach attempts to meet one's need for harmonious relationships by finding common interest. It is used in negotiations. Using compromising conflict style, the conflict may be resolved quickly and relationships are maintained.

The collaborating conflict style user assertively attempts to resolve the conflict with the best solution agreeable to all parties. The focus is on finding the best solution to the problem that is satisfactory to all parties. This is the only style that creates a true win–win situation. There is no one best style for resolving all conflicts. Your preferred style tends to meet your needs.